Standards
These standards govern dossiers, claim reviews, journal dispatches, member submissions, corrections, and public contact. They are part of the publication, not a private afterthought.
Anti-Christ.net studies false-salvation systems and the co-optation of civic, religious, technological, legal, and economic language. It criticizes conduct, policy, institutions, and systems. It does not reduce people to enemies.
The archive is pluralist. It is not anti-Christian, anti-religion, anti-atheist, or partisan by default. Religious and political claims are handled as evidence questions, civil-liberties questions, and symbolic readings.
Evidence
Primary documents, direct records, court filings, official statements, contemporaneous reporting, and named expert analysis outrank screenshots, rumors, anonymous claims, and viral interpretation.
Cite the strongest available source, preserve URLs and dates, distinguish official claims from independent findings, and keep a source trail.
Remove addresses, phone numbers, signatures, account numbers, family details, and irrelevant identifiers before publication.
Allegations about living people require public-interest relevance, strong sourcing, fair context, response opportunity when appropriate, and editorial escalation.
Accepted material includes documented civic writing, public records notes, court observations, policy analysis, philosophical essays, source leads, and corrections. Rejected material includes threats, doxxing, illegal plans, harassment, hatred, unsourced accusations, stolen material, private personal data, target boards, and escalation scripts.
AI tools may assist with drafting, summarizing, formatting, and research triage. They do not replace source review, editorial responsibility, corrections, or human judgment on risk. AI-generated factual claims require verification before publication.
Corrections are part of the archive. Readers can request a correction, clarification, update, or retraction through the corrections page. Open Corrections.
